ad space

Category Archives: Commercial Aviation Airport Security

What will we do without the TSA?

What will we do without the TSA?

As the shutdown continues with no end in sight, some people are speculating that TSA screeners may go on strike. Or, that more TSA workers will continue to walk off the job, have “blue flu,” or find an employer that can make a payroll, resulting in massive air system shutdowns.

While I think a strike is unlikely (at this point) and although it is illegal for TSA personnel to strike, what would happen if they did?

I have no doubt that Trump, who tends to fancy himself a little bit like former President Reagan, will do what Reagan did in 1981 when the air traffic controllers went on strike – he fired them all. It’s no secret that Trump likes firing people and I would not be surprised to see him do the same here. Some speculate that the Administration would try to use military personnel such as the National Guard, and federal law enforcement agencies to fill the gap until more screeners are hired and trained, but the question of who will be responsible for ensuring screening is conducted has already been answered. 

It’s the airlines. 

After 9/11, the TSA was created and took over screening from the airlines, who had the responsibility since the early 1970s, and had hired contractors to perform the job. What DID NOT CHANGE was the requirement that aircraft operators (i.e. the airlines) are responsible to ensure screening of persons and property has been conducted before allowing bags, people or cargo on board. It’s right there in the Aircraft Operators regulations, in black and white:

Title 49 CFR §1544.201   Acceptance and screening of individuals and accessible property.

(a) Preventing or deterring the carriage of any explosive, incendiary, or deadly or dangerous weapon. Each aircraft operator must use the measures in its security program to prevent or deter the carriage of any weapon, explosive, or incendiary on or about each individual’s person or accessible property before boarding an aircraft or entering a sterile area.

(b) Screening of individuals and accessible property. Except as provided in its security program, each aircraft operator must ensure that each individual entering a sterile area at each preboard screening checkpoint for which it is responsible, and all accessible property under that individual’s control, are inspected for weapons, explosives, and incendiaries as provided in §1544.207.

Without TSA, the airlines must either conduct screening themselves or find someone to do it for them, such as a contractor. But rest assured, they’ll find someone to do it, and there’s already a contract system in place – the Screening Partnership Program, referred to in the industry as “opt-out.”

In the US, 22 airports, with San Francisco International being the largest, already have private contractors conducting screening. Unlike the pre 9/11 days, the federal government (the TSA) is in charge of the contracts, not the airlines. There are already companies in the US that provide contract screening services that meet existing TSA training and performance standards.

Contracted-screening is the predominant model for most of the airports in the world with the exception of the United States. When US aircraft fly out of foreign countries, the passengers are not screened by TSA personnel – they are screened by foreign government personnel, or airport or airline contractors, from the country where the flight departs.

We could see a reverse of what we saw after 9/11. When TSA was created, many of the thousands of new-hires came from the existing contracted screening workforce. The companies are already out there. Personnel are already trained and certified because they’re currently working, without pay, for TSA. Contractors would immediately offer jobs to the freshly fired TSA screening  workforce to turn them right around and put them back at the checkpoint, under new management, and not subject to government shutdowns.

There would be a few weeks of disruption with the system, but the system will recover. As a stopgap, the aircraft operator regulations include a section to qualify airline personnel to conduct screening (Title 49 CFR Part 1544, Subpart E), if TSA or another approved entity is unavailable. We may see air carrier personnel, or the airlines contracted workforce that are hired to check-in passengers and baggage, being hastily trained and sent to the checkpoints during the transition. TSA supervisory personnel would be sent to the checkpoints, the way the air traffic controller supervisors were, and the federal government may deploy more law enforcement agents from other agencies to fly on commercial flights, to act as sort of backup Air Marshals, and provide a higher level of deterrence during the transition period.

Some may say that screening is too important to be left to contractors but consider that Ben Gurion in Israel, inarguably the most secure airport in the world, the baseline screening functions are conducted by contract personnel. And in another very important job in aviation is air traffic control. Presently 256 air traffic control towers in the US are staffed by contractors, not FAA personnel, though the Contract Tower Program.

Under a contract screening model it’s expected that TSA, as an agency, would continue to select and manage the contracting companies. There is always talk within the industry that screening may go back to the contractors at some point anyway, but if that happens, it must remain under the management of the TSA or another federal agency. The airlines should never again be left with the responsibility to conduct screening. That was the model prior to 9/11, and it didn’t turn out so well.

Whether the shutdown ushers in this change, or the politicians quit playing political poker with other people’s money and livelihood and end this shutdown, the United States depends on aviation more than any other country in the world. It will figure out a way to stay in business. Failure is not an option.

By Jeff Price,

Professor MSU Denver

Lead Author of Practical Aviation Security: Predicting and Preventing Future Threats

Leading Edge Strategies

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather
Security Checkpoints Are Choke Points

Security Checkpoints Are Choke Points

Today, the aviation industry screens passengers and their carry-on bags essentially the same way it did in the early 1970s. While detection technologies have changed to better detect threats and move people through the checkpoint, training and performance standards for screeners has improved, and risk-based processes have been implemented, the fundamental process is still the… Continue Reading

Theft of Aircraft at SeaTac

Theft of Aircraft at SeaTac

This is an evolving situation so facts may change the information expressed below. The theft of an aircraft out of SeaTac’s airport has shined a light on a rarely considered area of aviation security, the potential threat from those with unfettered access to an airplane.  The last significant incident like this was the Germanwings first… Continue Reading

Is Crowdsourcing A Component of Our Aviation Security of the Future?

Most of us have heard the phrase, “See something? Say something.” This phrase was adopted by New York City initially after the 9/11 attacks. The phrase was quickly adopted by the TSA as a mantra to encourage passengers and airport workers to report any suspicious activity, people and baggage. In theory, crowdsourcing an active watch… Continue Reading

Will Screening Detection Continue To Improve?

With repeated reports of detection failures during airport screening checkpoints, aviation security professionals discussed growing concerns during the AAAE/TSA/DHS Annual Aviation Security Summit in Washington DC in December 2017. The fact is that screening detection will continue to improve but likely will still not get a passing grade. The bad news is, a recent DHS… Continue Reading

How Will Checkpoint Screening Continue to Evolve?

We have all heard the reports of checkpoint screening led by the TSA failing at rates as high as 90%. During the AAAE/TSA/DHS Annual Aviation Security Summit in Washington DC in December 2017, industry professionals continued to debate methodology to improve our commercial aviation security screening protocols. In 2018, we will continue to see changes… Continue Reading

Will A Threat to Commercial Aviation Continue?

The quick answer to the question of whether the threat to commercial aviation will continue is yes. At the AAAE/TSA/DHS Annual Aviation Security Summit in Washington DC in December 2017, Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Commissioner, CBP, stated that commercial aviation security threats “…have been a constant since before 9/11. Our most consistent adversaries see aviation… Continue Reading

Miami security incident shows the system worked, in this case

The recent security incident at Miami International Airport begs the question whether this a failure or a success of airport security? From an airport security perspective this is a success because the individual was not able to either access an aircraft to place a prohibited item on board, nor cause any other act of unlawful interference. However, others will… Continue Reading